Market Failure and Natural Disasters

A Reexamination of Anti-Gouging Laws

Originally published in Public Contract Law Journal

In Gouging: Terrorist Attacks, Hurricanes, and the Legal and Economic Aspects of Post-Disaster Price Regulation, Professor Geoffrey Rapp reviews anti-gouging laws and the economic objections to such regulations. This article reviews Professor Rapp’s conclusion that economic arguments offer a decidedly negative view of anti-gouging laws.

In Gouging: Terrorist Attacks, Hurricanes, and the Legal and Economic Aspects of Post-Disaster Price Regulation, Professor Geoffrey Rapp reviews anti-gouging laws and the economic objections to such regulations. He argues that despite the fact that traditional economic arguments oppose anti-gouging laws, economic justifications nevertheless exist for such post-disaster laws, including the possible failure of electronic payment systems and behavioral insights about economic agents.

This article first reviews Professor Rapp’s conclusion that economic arguments offer a decidedly negative view of anti-gouging laws. It then analyzes and critiques Professor Rapp’s economic defense of such regulations by (1) applying a standard economic conceptelasticity—and highlighting the role of the market as a discovery process and (2) addressing behavioral economics’ assumptions about individuals’ responsiveness to price changes. Finally, this article offers recommendations concerning such laws.

Find the article on David Skarbek's website.

 

To speak with a scholar or learn more on this topic, visit our contact page.